Are organic agricultural management practices more or less effective at resisting drought than conventional agricultural practices?
Are organic agricultural management
practices more or less effective at resisting drought than conventional agricultural
practices?
Introduction
When you walk into the produce or meat sections of your local grocery store it is common these days to see several different types of the same fruits, vegetables or meats/dairy. There will be regular versions of these products and there may be organic, free range, grass feed, or naturally raised versions of these products. To the average consumer these labels mean that the products are “healthier” and that they are grown in a more natural system than the conventionally grown counterparts. While both of these things are true, the label on that USDA organic apple does not show the full picture.
One of the corner stones of organic certification in this
country and abroad is the concept that the production system must: improve the
quality of the environment in which it operates, conserve the resources
present, and minimize inputs and losses, among other concepts. Pimental succinctly
states this as “the aim of organic agriculture is to augment ecological
processes that foster plant nutrition yet conserve soil and water resources” (Pimental
et al. 2005)
This goal of
minimizing the impact to the natural system and taking a holistic approach to
agriculture in the hope that it will increase productivity and decrease harm
ecologically is accomplished by using a variety of different techniques. Buffer
strips of native grasses or forbs are planted along the edges of fields to
reduce soil erosion and promote pollinators. Cover crops are planted between
seasons or over bare ground during the growing season to improve water
infiltration, reduce weed competition, increase soil organic matter, and reduce
soil erosion. Rotating crops with legumes after grasses or vegetables reduces
soil erosion, reduces fertilizer needs, improves biological diversity and
improves water quality. No-till or minimal tillage reduces water loss, reduces
soil erosion, and adds organic matter into the system while reducing inputs (USDA
2017). It is these practices among other
that will be the focus of this post.
Body
In the region of the country that I live, the south, water
is not a concern for farmers like it is in other parts of the country. In
Tennessee water is all around us, it is abundant and availability is not generally
an issue like it is in the west. Non-irrigated farms in Tennessee and its
neighbors do have issues with short periods of drought during the summer but
water is not as much of a regulated resource like it is in other parts of the
country and abroad. In California, our nations largest and most profitable
producer of agricultural products, water is scarce and seemingly every drop is
accounted for by the state. California’s Mediterranean climate means that a
huge diversity of crops can be grown there successfully, but the scarcity of
water means that the majority of row crops are irrigated in someway. California
produces over four hundred different agricultural commodities, one-third of the
countries fresh market vegetables, two-thirds of our nations fresh fruits and 11-15%
of the nations agricultural production (CDFA 2017). In contrast to this
California has been in drought conditions for nearly a decade and 40-60% of the
states available water is used for agricultural irrigation (Johnson et al.
2015). Compared to their eastern
counterparts, agricultural producers in the western US have a much more vested
interest in protecting and conserving their limited water resources (Pimental
et al. 2004).
In developing countries around the world that have arid or semi-arid moisture regimes or seasonal rains, drought and water use are very much a life or death concern. Water shortages leave more than a billion people without adequate drinking water (Pimental et al. 2004). Agriculture consumes approximately 70% of fresh water world wide. Water usage for agricultural crops is considerable, as shown in Figure 1, around 1000 liters of water are required to produce 1 kilogram of cereal grain (Pimental et al. 2004). Conserving water is critical as global population continues to increase while the amount of fresh water stays the same. Increasing education about soil conservation practices may be part of the solution.
Many practices of organic agriculture focus on soil and
resource management. Some of these practices can have a positive benefit on decreasing
water use and improving conservation. Erosion and soil nutrient depletion adversely
affect a soils ability to hold and intake water. Soil erosion increases water
runoff and eroded soils have a run-off rate of about 30 percent (Pimental et
al. 2004). Eroded soils also absorb 87% less water than uneroded soils
(Pimenatl et al. 2004). By practicing no-till agriculture soil erosion and
therefore runoff are reduced (Lal 1993). This practice also increases the
accumulation and conservation of organic matter in the soil. Organic matter in
the soil is the highly decomposed residue from plants and animals. This matter aerates the soil and improves the
amount of water that is held and can infiltrate into the ground (Pimental et al
2004). High levels of organic matter can increase water infiltration by up to
150% (Pimental et al 2004. Cover crops planted between seasons or along side
other crops and crop residues retained when practicing no-tlll farming both aid
in water retention by reducing runoff and decreasing evaporation (Pimental et
al. 2004).
During times of drought
stress well managed soils preform better than others. Lotter and others analyzed
relative growth rates and yield of organic and conventional agriculture over 5
drought years between 1984 and 1998 in the northeastern US and found that corn
and soybeans grown in an organic system significantly out preformed those grown
with conventional methods and also
held more water as shown in Figure 2. Water capture of organic plots was
approximately 100% higher than conventional plots (Lotter et al. 1990).
With climate change comes changes to relative rainfall and unpredictable
drought conditions.
Warming has caused California to experience years of drought
and this trend is likely to continue in the future (Diffenbaugh et al. 2015). This
increase in drought incidence and the limited nature of water availability in
the west means that improvements in the agricultural system will need to be
made in order to decrease the amount of water that their agricultural land
uses. Intensively managing the soil would significantly improve the health of
the ecosystem and allow more water to be available for everything else (Scialabba
et al. 2010).
Warmer, dryer conditions will have a much larger impact on
general welfare in rain fed systems in developing countries. These systems use
less inputs and yield less than the farming systems used in the united states
but the people are much closer to the crops. Droughts in these systems mean
that individual families don’t eat. Education on soil management would improve
food and water security in these areas. Rainfed managed soils in Zimbabwe had
higher soil moisture and greater infiltration than unmanaged soils (Thierfelde et al. 2009).
Conclusion
Across the planet,
as population increases and demand for water and food increase water will
become an even more precious resource. The need to properly manage our soils is
critical if we hope to feed everyone. Although it is not a complete solution,
properly managing and conserving soil will help the water we have go farther
and will waste less of it. Climate change and warming trends will have an
unpredictable effects on our environment but may cause water scarcity or
drought in many areas. Organically managed agricultural systems and soil
conserving agricultural systems are shown to hold more water, intake more
water, and have less runoff than conventional agricultural systems. By
increasing organic matter and conserving plant residues, soil management practices
improve the systems water usage.
Sources:
United States
Department of Agriculture; Conservation Choices: Soil Health Practices, https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcseprd1318196.pdf,
April 2017
Pimentel, D., Hepperly, B., Hanson, J., Douds,D., Seidel, R.;
Environmental, Energetic, and Economic Comparisons of Organic and Conventional
Farming Systems, BioScience, Volume 55, Issue 7, 1
July 2005, Pages 573–582, https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0573:EEAECO]2.0.CO;2
California
Department of Food and Agriculture; California Agricultural Production
Statistics, https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/Statistics/PDFs/2016-17AgReport.pdf,
2017
Johnson,
R., Cody, R.; Congressional Research Service; California Agricultural
Production and Irrigated Water Use, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44093.pdf, June
2015
Pimentel,
D., Berger, B., Filiberto, D., Newton, M., Wolfe, B., Karabinakis, B., Clark, S.,
Poon, E., Abbett, E., and Nandagopal, S. 2004. Water resources: agricultural
and environmental issues. Bioscience 54 (10): 909-918.
David Pimentel, Bonnie Berger, David
Filiberto, Michelle Newton, Benjamin Wolfe, Elizabeth Karabinakis, Steven
Clark, Elaine Poon, Elizabeth Abbett, Sudha Nandagopal; Water Resources:
Agricultural and Environmental Issues, BioScience, Volume
54, Issue 10, 1 October 2004, Pages 909–918, https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0909:WRAAEI]2.0.CO;2
Lotter, D.,
Seidel, R., & Liebhardt, W. (2003). The performance of organic and
conventional cropping systems in an extreme climate year. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 18(3), 146-154
Diffenbaugh
N., Swain D., & Touma D., 2015. Global Warming Increases California Drought
Risk. National Acadamy of Sciences.
March 2015
Scialabba,
N., Müller-Lindenlauf, M., 2010. Organic agriculture and climate change.
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25, 158–169.
Thierfelder,
C., Wall, P.C., 2009. Effects of conservation agriculture techniques on
infiltration and soil water content in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Soil and Tillage
Research 105, 217-227.
Comments
Post a Comment